Skip to main content
rss feedour twitterour facebook page linkdin

Financial Happenings Blog
Thursday, January 12 2012
Jim Parker, of Dimensional Australia, in his latest Outside the Flags column points out some of the reasons why this firmdoes not include hedge funds in our investment approach.  It gets back to two key fundamentals:

- Understand into what you are investing
- Keep costs low

We don't belive hedge funds provide either of these outcomes.  Please find Jim's comments following.


January 5, 2012
Hedge of Darkness
Vice President
213 recent views \ 213 views all-time

It's true. Big money can be made from hedge funds. If you run one, that is.

That's the conclusion of a new book, which says people who invest in hedge funds would have been better off over the past nine years if they had stuck to a broadly diversified portfolio of vanilla stocks and bonds.

The book is called 'The Hedge Fund Mirage: The Illusion of Big Money and Why It's Too Good to be True'. It was written by Simon Lack, an asset manager who formerly chose hedge funds for major US bank JPMorgan.

Lack argues that the 18 per cent return on hedge funds in the nine years to November, 2011 was easily beaten by the total 29 per cent gain from the S&P-500 index. The gap was even starker for investment grade corporate bonds, which in the same period gained 77 per cent, as measured by the Dow Jones Corporate bond index.

Of course, the underperformance of hedge funds over this period is even greater once the customary 2 per cent management fee and 20 per cent performance fees charged by hedge fund managers are taken into account.

If individual hedge fund managers are generating the desired "alpha", or additional returns above the market, then the benefits of that skill tend to go to the managers themselves than to investors.

In fact, Lack estimates that from 1998 to 2010, the hedge fund industry captured at least 86 per cent of the returns it earned for its customers. This might explain why yachts cruising the Caribbean tend to be skippered by hedge fund managers, not investors.

For anyone who has followed the hype surrounding hedge funds for many years, this is not really a surprise. A good proportion of the investing public–egged on by the financial media–genuinely wants to believe that consistent market-beating returns are achievable without taking on additional risk and paying excessive fees.

From a marketing perspective, at least, the appeal is fairly evident. After all, the more exclusive you make a club, the more likely people will pay a premium for joining it.

While the hedge fund industry no doubt would contest the findings of Lack's book, one doesn't have to agree with his numbers to still harbour reasonable doubts about risking one's hard-earned savings by investing in hedge funds.

In a recent white paper1, Dimensional research associate Ronnie Shah explains that due to the lack of disclosure around returns, it is difficult to determine how much alpha, if any, hedge funds generate.

Industry groups that report hedge fund returns rely on voluntary disclosures by the funds themselves on the returns they generate. Shah notes this creates potential for biases in the data, such as the omission of poor returns or the dropping out of the returns of failed or discontinued funds.

This is in addition to other drawbacks of hedge funds, such as illiquidity, relative lack of oversight, the additional costs of leverage and derivatives and, of course, the substantial fees charged by the managers themselves.

Shah's paper concludes that the highly uncertain payoff from hedge funds, the high expense ratios and the lack of disclosure around them mean investors should exercise caution before investing in them.

Starting one up is another matter altogether.

1. Shah, Ronnie R., "Demystifying Hedge Funds: A Review" — Dimensional Fund Advisors

Posted by: AT 08:32 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Request for Information 
If you have questions, or would like more information, please go to our Contact page and leave your name and contact information.